Raj Dhure

Raj Dhure's Review on Mahavir Education Trust's Shah and Anchor Kutchhi Engineering College (SAKEC)

Overall Rating: 3.3

Verified
Reviewed on Feb 11, 2015
Write a Review

College Infrastructure and Hostel Facilities

3

quality of classrooms is satisfactory... every classroom should have a projector... libraries should be provided with more books... wi-fi should be provided for students... the canteen is pathetic

Academics and Faculty

3.5

number of assignments should be reduced... the quality of teaching is good... some prpfessors are too good while some have a scope of improvement

Fees and Scholarships

3.5

college fee can be reduced... more number of seats should be made available for students of low income zone... linguistic minority should be prohibited

Overall Rating

3.3

Verified

Academics & Faculty

3.5

Fees & Scholarships

3.5

College Infrastructure & Hostel Facilities

3

Similar Reviews

Verified
Akshay Chavan Batch 2017 BE Information Technology
4.6
Reviewed on Mar 19, 2016
5 Academics
4 Fees
4.5 Placements
5 Infrastructure

Academics & Faculty : There are daily 4 lectures with 2 hours of practicals. Nice labs and all resources are available for study and practice.  Teachers are well experienced and knows current affairs of technology.

Verified
Javeria Shaikh Batch 2016 BE Information Technology
2.2
Reviewed on Feb 22, 2015
2.5 Academics
2 Fees
2.5 Placements
2 Infrastructure

Academics & Faculty : Teachers prefer verbal teaching which becomes boring and causes our mind to divert from the topic. Few profs make use of projector but then they just read what is writing in the slide which also turns out to be boring

Verified
Tushar Chemburkar Batch 2016 BE Information Technology
2.5
Reviewed on Feb 15, 2015
1.5 Academics
3.5 Infrastructure

Academics & Faculty : Teachers dont fully encourage you to learn the subject, they instead focus on teaching you how to achieve marks in exams. Assignments and projects are not given enough of time.

Verified
Vidit Shah Batch 2016 BE Information Technology
2.5
Reviewed on Feb 15, 2015
2.5 Academics
1.5 Fees
3.5 Placements

Academics & Faculty : methodology is good but written notes are not provided by teacher which is a negative point  otherwise everything is good . .

View All Reviews

Loading...